2009- Engineering Leader: Automotive Tiers 1 Supplier
“MaTeLo gives our company a very effective way to test our products: - We found much more bugs than we did with our traditional test scripting
- MaTeLo is the only way today to test the integration of our requirements together
- Modelling test in model divide by at least 4 the time necessary for test design
- MaTeLo successfully managed to test complex features that could not be tested by scripting
- MaTeLo even found bugs in part of our ECU which was defined as tested without bugs
|
2008- Automotive T1 Supplier
“ With MaTeLo, our product quality has ranged from 5000 bugs every one million lines of code to an average of 100. |
- Delphi Electronics & Safety Division - Software Systems Test Engineer
“Advantages of Model Based Testing in Automotive : - faults can be early detected (especially when requirements are expressed through executable models)
- once the model is developed, requirements changes can be easily applied to the generated software and tests
- large amount of test cases can be generated (and executed)
- product time-to-market can be shortened (if methodology correctly applied)
- lots of system aspects can be verified and validated before real hardware and software are available
- test reporting is automatic (with various kinds of metrics generated)
|
2007- Magneti Marelli
“To achieve an instrument cluster validation, we replaced our old 70-page test plan by a MaTeLo usage model of 2 pages, much easier to maintain. |
2006- Testing department leader - Automotive T1 Supplier
“MaTeLo allows us to re-use almost 50% of a test model from one project to another in the same product line, so divide the test time by 2. |
2005- Siemens Group
“Thanks to MaTeLo, our development cost decreased by 23% on our Car Safety Access product. |
2004- France Telecom - Research & Development
“MaTeLo makes it possible to assess the mean time to failure (MTTF) in the normal product usage. This is much more effective than just get a default list to analyse |
|